yuu_nkjm blog
2011-08-05(Fri) [長年日記] 編集
[Windows][Windows 7 (64bit)][Troubleshooting] Windowsdで特定のフォルダにアクセス出来ない問題への対処
問題
ある新しいマシンにWindowsをクリーンインストールし,古いマシンから取り出したHDDを読み込めるようにする.そうしたとき,ユーザディレクトリ(C:\Users\xxx)などが読み込めないことがある. XPから移行した後,HDDの引っ越し後などに発生した.
解決方法
アクセス出来ないフォルダを右クリック→セキュリティタブ→詳細設定→アクセス許可の変更から,「子オブジェクトのアクセス許可すべてを,このオブジェクトからの継承可能なアクセス許可で置き換える」のチェックボックスにチェックを入れることにより,アクセス出来るようになった.移行前と移行後でユーザ名,パスワードが同じ状態である必要があるのかは不明.
これでうまくいかないときは,「管理ツール」→「コンピュータの管理」→「ローカルユーザとグループ」→「ユーザ」→「Administrator」と選択し,アカウントを有効にしたあとで,Administratorとしてログインし,同じ操作をすれば良い,はず.

(この図ではまだチェックを入れていない.)
関連ページ
2011-08-04(Thu) [長年日記] 編集
[KVM][openSUSE][Linux] KVMのパフォーマンスをunixbenchで計測する
unixbenchのインストール
yastでレポジトリをbenchで検索するとcpufreq-bench, unixbench, dbench, xbenchが引っかかったが,unixbenchが一番良さそうだった.yastでインストールして,/usr/share/qa/unixbench/Runを実行すれば,ベンチマークが動き出す.
openSUSE11.4では,レポジトリに入っているのはunixbench 4.0.1という古いバージョンだった.5.x系はマルチプロセッサに対応しているのに対して,4系ではマルチプロセッサに対応していないことに注意.
KVMのパフォーマンス - Unix Bench 5.x系で計測
まとめ
- 実機とKVMで大きな差が見られたのは,Process Creationか.Pipe-based Context Switchingは,差が見られるときと見られないときがあって,イマイチはっきりしないが,差がありそう.
- KVM上で動かす実アプリケーションに依存するとは思うが,実機ではなくKVMを使うのもあり.
実機(Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: redwhale: openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop -- #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) CPU 0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6146.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization (snip) CPU 7: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz (6207.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 08:24:14 - 08:52:25 8 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31286938.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4935.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2173.1 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1164790.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 342708.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2506433.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2602655.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 224412.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 15829.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5455.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3380.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4519616.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31286938.9 2681.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4935.1 897.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2173.1 505.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1164790.4 2941.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 342708.4 2070.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2506433.3 4321.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2602655.6 2092.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 224412.5 561.0 Process Creation 126.0 15829.8 1256.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5455.3 1286.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3380.0 5633.4 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4519616.0 3013.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1782.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 08:52:25 - 09:20:45 8 CPUs in system; running 8 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 134976120.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 34135.1 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 25045.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 936668.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 254989.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2579818.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 10666961.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1929033.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 63909.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 31369.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 4530.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 15812586.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 134976120.3 11566.1 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 34135.1 6206.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 25045.8 5824.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 936668.4 2365.3 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 254989.5 1540.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2579818.8 4448.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 10666961.4 8574.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1929033.6 4822.6 Process Creation 126.0 63909.4 5072.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 31369.3 7398.4 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 4530.2 7550.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 15812586.1 10541.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 5540.7
KVM プロセッサ×2(on Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: kvmsuse: openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop -- #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (6146.5 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (6146.5 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 10:37:50 - 11:06:02 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34825586.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4947.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2858.2 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1103293.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 314596.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2311162.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2497174.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 136686.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 8086.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6008.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1368.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4473280.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34825586.4 2984.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4947.3 899.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 2858.2 664.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1103293.7 2786.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 314596.2 1900.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2311162.8 3984.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2497174.9 2007.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 136686.3 341.7 Process Creation 126.0 8086.2 641.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6008.4 1417.1 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1368.4 2280.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4473280.8 2982.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1526.2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 11:06:02 - 11:34:12 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 66933853.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 9533.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 8193.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1317719.0 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 351611.6 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3256364.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 4737484.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 708496.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 21420.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9374.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1427.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 6949687.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 66933853.9 5735.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9533.4 1733.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 8193.7 1905.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1317719.0 3327.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 351611.6 2124.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3256364.4 5614.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4737484.1 3808.3 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 708496.1 1771.2 Process Creation 126.0 21420.8 1700.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9374.1 2210.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1427.7 2379.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 6949687.6 4633.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2776.8
KVM プロセッサ×6(on Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: kvmsuse: openSUSE 11.4 (x86_64) OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop -- #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 Machine: x86_64 (x86_64) CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (6146.5 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET (snip) CPU 5: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.14.0 (6146.5 bogomips) x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 木 8月 18 2011 21:52:39 - 22:21:20 6 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34727302.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4948.3 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 1669.8 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1067639.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 297204.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2268963.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2598809.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 252469.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 3383.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4625.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2351.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4471679.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34727302.1 2975.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4948.3 899.7 Execl Throughput 43.0 1669.8 388.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1067639.6 2696.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 297204.9 1795.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2268963.8 3912.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2598809.9 2089.1 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 252469.2 631.2 Process Creation 126.0 3383.3 268.5 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4625.3 1090.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2351.5 3919.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4471679.3 2981.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1453.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 木 8月 18 2011 22:21:20 - 22:49:32 6 CPUs in system; running 6 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 132040998.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 26264.2 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 16806.4 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 671883.7 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 176490.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2219914.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 8925354.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1266987.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 37824.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 21340.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3018.2 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 14155711.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 132040998.4 11314.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 26264.2 4775.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 16806.4 3908.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 671883.7 1696.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 176490.2 1066.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2219914.8 3827.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 8925354.7 7174.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1266987.8 3167.5 Process Creation 126.0 37824.7 3002.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 21340.7 5033.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3018.2 5030.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 14155711.6 9437.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 4118.8
実機(QuadCore Xeon X3220 2.40GHz)
======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 -- #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 Machine: i686 (i386) CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz (4802.3 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization (snip) CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3220 @ 2.40GHz (4799.5 bogomips) Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 08:23:01 - 08:51:06 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10538103.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2204.4 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2390.1 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 344724.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 88277.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 825631.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 492919.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 80393.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7785.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4017.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2163.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 648029.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10538103.7 903.0 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2204.4 400.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2390.1 555.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 344724.4 870.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 88277.9 533.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 825631.4 1423.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 492919.4 396.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 80393.3 201.0 Process Creation 126.0 7785.5 617.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4017.6 947.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2163.5 3605.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 648029.3 432.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 679.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: 金 8月 19 2011 08:51:06 - 09:19:12 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41129963.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 8437.9 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 12350.5 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 145095.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 39586.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 484689.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1949629.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 678733.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 37720.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 18309.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2512.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2049215.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41129963.1 3524.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8437.9 1534.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 12350.5 2872.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 145095.5 366.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39586.0 239.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 484689.7 835.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1949629.1 1567.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 678733.6 1696.8 Process Creation 126.0 37720.0 2993.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 18309.8 4318.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2512.9 4188.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2049215.9 1366.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1569.7
KVMのパフォーマンス - Unix Bench 4.x系で計測
4.x系の結果を残してあるが,5.x系を使った方が良い.
実機とKVMで大きな差が出たのは,Process Creationか.プロセッサを2個割り当てたときと比べて,プロセッサを6個割り当てたとき,Process Creationの性能が劣化したのは何でだろうか.あと,Pipe-based Context Switchingにも若干の性能劣化があるように見える.気のせいかもしれんけど.
実機(Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
実機のデータは以下.プロセッサはCorei7 940(8コア)である.
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.0.1) System -- Linux redwhale 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Arithmetic Test (type = double) 29820.0 1.0 0.0 Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22917423.2 1963.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 0.0 0.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1268131.0 3202.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 354522.0 2142.1 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2599929.0 4482.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2555097.3 2053.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 215490.4 538.7 Process Creation 126.0 15677.9 1244.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2957.3 4928.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4513453.5 3009.0
KVM プロセッサ×2(on Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
KVMにプロセッサを2個割り当てた場合のデータは以下.
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.0.1) System -- Linux kvmsuse 2.6.37.1-1.2-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-02-21 10:34:10 +0100 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Arithmetic Test (type = double) 29820.0 1.0 0.0 Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23293754.4 1996.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 0.0 0.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1145196.0 2891.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 321544.0 1942.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2510289.0 4328.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2525370.0 2030.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 125306.9 313.3 Process Creation 126.0 7853.1 623.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1209.3 2015.5 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4491089.4 2994.1
KVM プロセッサ×6(on Core i7 950 @ 3.07GHz)
KVMにプロセッサを6個割り当てた場合のデータは以下.
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.0.1) System -- Linux kvmsuse 2.6.37.6-0.7-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-07-21 02:17:24 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Arithmetic Test (type = double) 29820.0 1.0 0.0 Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23093871.0 1978.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 0.0 0.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1090723.0 2754.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 297632.0 1798.4 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2294295.0 3955.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2500653.4 2010.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 268735.2 671.8 Process Creation 126.0 3427.6 272.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2128.7 3547.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4471322.5 2980.9
実機(QuadCore Xeon X3220 2.40GHz)
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.0.1) System -- Linux falcon 2.6.23.1-42.fc8 #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:55:12 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX Arithmetic Test (type = double) 29820.0 642874.8 215.6 Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9713051.3 832.3 Execl Throughput 43.0 2387.3 555.2 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 304295.0 768.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 86306.0 521.5 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 806413.0 1390.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 477059.3 383.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 88368.5 220.9 Process Creation 126.0 7726.8 613.2 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2272.0 3786.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 645915.3 430.6
2011-08-03(Wed) [長年日記] 編集
[Network][Buffalo][iPad/iPodTouch/iPhone][Kindle] バッファローの無線LAN親機にiPadで接続出来ない
iPadやiPod touch,Kindleなどで,バッファローの無線LAN親機(ブロードバンドルータ)に接続すると,時々は繋がるんだけど,非常に不安定でとても悲しい思いをしていた.iPadに固定のIPアドレスを割り振るように無線LAN親機に設定をしたところ,この不具合は解消された.
とにかく詳細な接続方法が知りたいという人は,「丁寧な解説ページ」セクションで紹介したページを参照のこと.
原因
Google先生にお伺いしたところ,こんな記事(iPad Wi-Fi接続)が.
この不具合の詳細が知りたい人は接続不安定と不具合の簡単な説明というセクションを読むと良い.
特にバッファローブロードバンドルータの場合、最初繋いだクライアントに192.168.11.2先頭の値よりIPアドレスをインクリメントししかも動的な事が主な原因になっている様子。
ざっくりいうと,引用したこの部分が不具合の原因の様なので,iPadに割り当てられるIPアドレスを固定してやれば良いことが分かる.
対策
- iPadのMACアドレス調べる.
- そのMACアドレスに対して,特定のIPアドレスを払い出すように無線LAN親機に設定する.
ものすごく簡単に説明すると上記でOK!
丁寧な解説ページ
より丁寧な解説は以下のページなどを参照.